I cannot begin to describe the overwhelming feeling of relief that washed over me during the Apple event announcing the iPhone 15. I feel like Apple genuinely cares about me and my needs. I’ve been saying it for a year, and no one would listen. Every time I pick up my 172-gram iPhone 14, I have always felt like it was a gram too heavy. At last, this needless energy expenditure can end. Thank you, Apple for finally putting that $29 billion in R&D toward innovation that the world really needed right now: a 171-gram iPhone 15.
Forget everything you know about innovation from the Rennaissance to the Digital Age, welcome to the exciting Age of Inconsequential Improvements.
As a society, we seem to be getting more and more willing to accept lackluster incremental changes in lieu of groundbreaking innovations.
We’re all to blame. Businesses milk every last ounce out of their most recent “greatest hit”, and as a market we support it.
It seems that even the exciting jump to electric cars is quickly being ruined. All the marketing is focused on slightly more range/power, but they are still the same interior scheme and general composition that has existed since someone decided that was the best way to do it a century ago. Seats in rows, steering wheel, doors… not much has been done to rethink the most popular way we move people around.
After spending more than a decade throwing elbows and raising a ruckus to try to force innovation into one of the world's most rigid institutions—education—I have some strong opinions on where we need to make changes.
We need to teach our kids how to innovate.
Or at the very least, make the learning process one that rages more actively against the dying of the light.
We need to raise a generation so familiar with creating and innovating that when they see the stamp of innovation applied without merit, they raise an earth-shattering eyebrow.
Needless to say, this is challenging. Our current system, funding, tools, and resources are hyper-focused on making students good at remembering. The system is primarily geared to train students on how to be passive (sit where instructed, speak when asked, work where assigned, and achieve within limitations).
The onus is on teachers and parents to figure it out on their own.
I hear it talked about plenty by leaders/organizations/decision makers, but until we radically rethink performance evaluations and funding, and rid the world of the bane of high-stakes standardized testing (a blog rant for another day), we have to hope that teachers and parents will find a way (like they always do).
So whether you’re a parent trying to elevate your child’s perspective, or a teacher hoping to make your students innovative ruckus raisers—I wanted to share what I have seen work.
This is not a comprehensive or final take on this theme. However, it should give us a starting point to challenge the dilution of genuine innovation.